blog post

Building Without a Technical Co-Founder

In the startup world, a common piece of advice is that every company needs a technical cofounder, especially in tech-focused industries. But is this always necessary? The answer isn’t so clear-cut. While having a technical cofounder can offer significant advantages, there are several paths to success, even without one. Here’s a deeper dive into when you might need a technical cofounder and when you can proceed without one, AKA, with the help of AI app builders like Sutro or no-code platforms like Bubble.

The case for having a technical co-founder

If your startup is building a tech-heavy product, like a software platform, mobile app, or AI-driven solution, having someone with deep technical expertise is essential. A technical co-founder can translate your vision into code, manage development processes, and ensure that the product is scalable and secure. They’ll also have an understanding of cutting-edge technologies, making it easier to innovate and stay competitive. Additionally, once your product is live, you’ll need to maintain and improve it. This means having a development team, which a technical co-founder can manage to ensure that everything runs smoothly from a technical standpoint. They’ll also know how to hire the right talent, set up a development culture, and oversee long-term product roadmaps.

If you plan to raise capital for your startup, it’s important to be mindful of the optics of your founding team to potential investors. Venture capitalists and angel investors often prefer startups with balanced teams. If your product hinges on technology and you lack a technical co-founder, investors might hesitate. Having someone on board who can speak the technical language and present the technical vision adds credibility to your team. It shows that you have the right leadership in place to build and scale the product.

There are situations where you really don’t need a technical co-founder

Not every business is based on cutting-edge technology. If you’re starting a business that doesn’t rely on proprietary tech (e.g., an e-commerce business, service-based startup, or a media company), hiring technical help as needed may be sufficient. A freelance developer or a tech agency can often handle the job without needing a full-time technical partner. These days, outsourcing has become a viable option for many startups. You can hire talented developers from around the world, work with product development agencies, or use low-code/no-code platforms to build and launch your MVP. Sutro’s LLM-powered AI app builder builds a production-ready app based on a single text prompt of your idea and exponentially increased the viability of no-code platforms and tools as technical co-founder replacements.

Some non-technical founders take it upon themselves to learn the basics of coding, project management, or how to evaluate tech talent. While you may not become an expert overnight, understanding the fundamentals can bridge the gap between you and developers, making it easier to lead a tech project. Over time, this can reduce the urgency for a full-time technical co-founder, at least in the early stages.

One more thing you can do if you plan to raise capital without a technical co-founder is build a network of technical advisors. Having experienced professionals to guide you on critical technical decisions, validate your product’s feasibility, or assist in hiring the right talent can help you compensate for not having a technical leader on the founding team.

Here are the key considerations you should weigh before making your decision

A co-founder typically owns a significant stake in the company and helps set the direction. If the technical vision is critical to your product’s success, and you aren’t well-versed in it, having a technical co-founder ensures that you have a partner who shares your vision. However, this also means relinquishing some control, which may not always be easy if you’re protective of the original concept. 

Hiring a co-founder might cost less in the short term since they typically take equity instead of a salary, but it’s a long-term commitment. If you go the agency or freelance route, you’ll need to budget for development costs, but you retain more control over the company’s direction and equity. In the early stages, outsourcing or hiring temporary tech help might work well, but as your company grows, you’ll need technical leadership. A technical co-founder provides strategic oversight, helping the company scale and adapt to new technological challenges. If your long-term vision involves complex technology or scaling, a co-founder might be more sustainable than continuous outsourcing.

Ultimately, the decision depends on the nature of your business and your product. If technology is at the core of your product and essential for its success, a technical co-founder can be invaluable. However, if tech is not central or you’re comfortable with outsourcing and using no-code platforms or AI app builders, you might not need one in the early stages.

For non-technical founders, there are increasingly more resources like Sutro, platforms, and networks to help you succeed without a technical co-founder. However, as your company grows, you’ll need to consider how to fill the technical leadership gap, whether through a full-time hire or by eventually bringing on a technical co-founder. Every startup is unique, and there is no one-size-fits-all answer. Understanding your business’s needs and your own capabilities will help you make the right decision.

Let’s level the playing field.

Ready to get started?

Share your app idea with Sutro and watch it get built instantly.
Try it now